United Bankruptcy Case Developments
On Friday, February 18th, Judge Wedoff of the US Bankruptcy Court in Chicago granted ALPA's motion to compel the Company to continue paying benefits under the pilot non-qualified pension program. The non-qualified program pays pension benefits in excess of the limits on benefits payable from tax-qualified defined benefit pension plans under Section 415(b) of the Internal Revenue Code, as well as benefits attributable to the portion of pilot compensation in excess of the maximum amount which can be taken into account by tax-qualified plans under Section 417(a) of the Code. United had announced on February 3rd, three days after the Restructuring Agreement between it and ALPA had been ratified by pilots and approved by the Bankruptcy Court, that it was unilaterally "suspending" payment of non-qualified benefits. Under the Restructuring Agreement, United is required to maintain the pilot defined benefit pension plan in full force and effect and to take no action to terminate the plan prior to April 11, 2005.
ALPA responded to the Company's unilateral action by filing an expedited grievance under its collective bargaining agreement with United and by filing an emergency motion in the Bankruptcy Court under Section 1113(f) of the Bankruptcy Code. Section 1113(f) rohibits Chapter 11 debtors from unilaterally modifying the terms of a collective bargaining agreement without first complying with a statutory procedure requiring negotiations and a court hearing. The Restructuring Agreement was the result of negotiations under Section 1113, but the issue of termination of the non-qualified program prior to termination of the qualified defined benefit plan was never raised by United during the course of the negotiations and the Restructuring Agreement contained no provision authorizing such action by the Company. ALPA's motion requested that the Bankruptcy Court order the Company to continue non-qualified payments.
ALPA's motion was heard on February 18th. Judge Wedoff rejected the Company's argument that ALPA was required to arbitrate the dispute before the System Board of Adjustment under the collective bargaining agreement. The Judge stated that the Company's action "lacked any colorable basis" under the Restructuring Agreement and the collective bargaining agreement, in effect holding that the Company's argument that the agreements allowed it to stop non-qualified benefit payments was frivolous. There was therefore no legitimate issue for an arbitrator to decide. The Judge also rejected several technical arguments under the Bankruptcy Code. The Court accordingly granted ALPA's motion and ordered the Company to continue paying non-qualified pension benefits.
The Company has now announced that it will abide by the Court's order.
On other matters, the retired pilots group and the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation have appealed the Bankruptcy Court's January 31 order approving the Restructuring Agreement. The Agreement remains in effect while those appeals are pending in the United States District Court. The PBGC's lawsuit seeking involuntary termination of the pilot defined benefit plan under Section 4042 of ERISA, filed in US District Court on December 30th, has been transferred to the Bankruptcy Court by the District Judge. The PBGC has asked the District Judge to reconsider her ruling but, in the meantime, the case is pending before the Bankruptcy Judge. ALPA has been granted party status and the right to participate fully in the case, as has the retired pilot group. The parties are engaged in working out the schedule for pretrial preparation of the case.
Back to top